我的本科同学(即将赴百度UER的一位MM噢,百度的同学请踊跃)现在的研究生论文正在进行一项关于网络无障碍(也就是accessibility 啦)的研究,这一项在中国目前的互联网基本上还是空白(想想百度的老年搜索,hmm),所以请大家多多帮忙,还有手机充值卡做奖励哦!
请猛击下方链接开始调查,只需要5分钟左右的时间
http://www.ie.tsinghua.edu.cn/zhoulianhui/
为了避免引导实验结果我就不多说了~请大家多多分享~
我的本科同学(即将赴百度UER的一位MM噢,百度的同学请踊跃)现在的研究生论文正在进行一项关于网络无障碍(也就是accessibility 啦)的研究,这一项在中国目前的互联网基本上还是空白(想想百度的老年搜索,hmm),所以请大家多多帮忙,还有手机充值卡做奖励哦!
请猛击下方链接开始调查,只需要5分钟左右的时间
http://www.ie.tsinghua.edu.cn/zhoulianhui/
为了避免引导实验结果我就不多说了~请大家多多分享~
懒人有禅上曾经有过一次对“Three Waves of HCI”的讨论,猛击这里。
今天看到一篇07年的论文 The Three Paradigms of HCI,对“HCI的三波”有新的解读,文章娓娓道来,很有说服力。(直接复制粘贴了,懒人有禅嘛,哈利路亚)
1st Paradigm: Man-Machine coupling
The goal of work in this paradigm is to optimize the fit between humans and machines; the questions to be answered focus on identifying problems in coupling and developing pragmatic solutions to them.
2nd Paradigm: Mind-Computer symmetric, coupled info processor
It is oriented around the idea that human information processing is deeply analogous to computational signal processing. It put emphasis on a set of information processing phenomena or issues in computers and users such as ‘how does information get in’, ‘what transformations does it undergo’, ‘how does it go out again,’ ‘how can it be communicated efficiently’ etc.
3rd Paradigm: phenomenologically situated
其实吧,就是context sensitive
这段话说得很好:The 1st and 2nd paradigms acknowledge context primarily as “those non-technological factors that affect the use of the technology.” Under the 3rd paradigm, we ask not “how does context give our design meaning?” but instead “how does our design accommodate the context?” This latter question includes what we do not put into our design, our restraint, or “zensign.” It also encompasses the possibility that the technological system is reported not because it is particularly unique or attractive, but because of how it fits into the particulars of a complex situation. A consequence of this is that context is a central component not only to the problem (if any) but also to design and evaluation.
附表一张:
最近评论