<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 关于Treeview的一个交互细节</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lanrenux.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139</link>
	<description>关注用户体验的懒人们</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-319</guid>
		<description>one possible scenario: the current folder has thousands of hundreds folders but the user only want to do something on the current folder.
I think it really depends on the cost of expanding sub-folders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one possible scenario: the current folder has thousands of hundreds folders but the user only want to do something on the current folder.<br />
I think it really depends on the cost of expanding sub-folders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-85</guid>
		<description>As to thr VERSIONS,

coz I changed back to the original theme, but it still doesn't work out. Opps...So I guess it might be the version that realy matters. Actually Pro and Home do have some slight differences on the UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to thr VERSIONS,</p>
<p>coz I changed back to the original theme, but it still doesn&#8217;t work out. Opps&#8230;So I guess it might be the version that realy matters. Actually Pro and Home do have some slight differences on the UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-84</guid>
		<description>yep. I concede the core of WIN is worth to be appreciated, but it would be better if it take more time to refine its exterior quality. Actually I do think microsoft should pay attention to this. Although every time the new WIN has been completely reformed from the inside, but it seems to make no sense to the untechnical customers because such kinda "same old same old" external performance doesn't really make people acknowledge and appreciate its "beauty".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep. I concede the core of WIN is worth to be appreciated, but it would be better if it take more time to refine its exterior quality. Actually I do think microsoft should pay attention to this. Although every time the new WIN has been completely reformed from the inside, but it seems to make no sense to the untechnical customers because such kinda &#8220;same old same old&#8221; external performance doesn&#8217;t really make people acknowledge and appreciate its &#8220;beauty&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuancheng</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuancheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-82</guid>
		<description>hmmm... "natural beauty" does not always bring about "beauty", but we should also accept it in order to understand the original of the world(here, the Windows) better.

正版XPhome和这个有什么关联？我想不到。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230; &#8220;natural beauty&#8221; does not always bring about &#8220;beauty&#8221;, but we should also accept it in order to understand the original of the world(here, the Windows) better.</p>
<p>正版XPhome和这个有什么关联？我想不到。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-81</guid>
		<description>But it seems 2 me the word "beauty" does not go this way--at least not the WIN one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it seems 2 me the word &#8220;beauty&#8221; does not go this way&#8211;at least not the WIN one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-80</guid>
		<description>btw，我是正版的XPhome，是不是这个原因？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw，我是正版的XPhome，是不是这个原因？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuancheng</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuancheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-79</guid>
		<description>u should learn to appreciate the natural beauty of Windows..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u should learn to appreciate the natural beauty of Windows..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-78</guid>
		<description>就装了一个OSX美化包，不过它应该不会连这些细节都改了吧。。总之我点盘符文件夹都不会点的同时打开……囧。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>就装了一个OSX美化包，不过它应该不会连这些细节都改了吧。。总之我点盘符文件夹都不会点的同时打开……囧。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuancheng</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuancheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-77</guid>
		<description>呃。。。这就奇怪了，你设置过什么吗？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>呃。。。这就奇怪了，你设置过什么吗？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuancheng</title>
		<link>http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuancheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanrenux.com/?p=139#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Yep, of course we should keep consistence. I also think it is reasonable for Windows Explorer to expand sub-folders and open contends at the same time.

However, the last question I posed was asking if there is any scenario in which we should only open contends, without expanding sub-folders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, of course we should keep consistence. I also think it is reasonable for Windows Explorer to expand sub-folders and open contends at the same time.</p>
<p>However, the last question I posed was asking if there is any scenario in which we should only open contends, without expanding sub-folders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
